From Reuse the work. Verify the result.Issue published Sep 4, 2026

When the facts change, does the AI change its plan?

Published September 3, 2026

What it saysThis test gives assistants conflicting information from users, stored knowledge, and tools. The tested models did not reliably handle every kind of conflict.

Why it mattersMentioning a new fact is not enough. The assistant must use it in its next action.

Try thisCreate a test where an old availability result conflicts with a fresh one.

How to use it

Suggested steps

  1. Create a test where an old availability result conflicts with a fresh one.
  2. Check which result the assistant uses when it acts.
  3. Inspect the resulting record and review any mistaken decisions.
A changed fact should change the actionConceptual explanation · Evals Weekly
CheckWhat to look for
Old result: availableAssistant has an initial plan
Fresh result: unavailablePlan and action must update

Keep in mind A controlled test does not cover every conflict a real product will encounter.

A quick check for yourself

What is the practical lesson?

Show answer

Mentioning a new fact is not enough. The assistant must use it in its next action.

Source & why it’s here

KC-Bench (opens in a new tab)

Original issue reading order, preserved from the archive.